Thursday, September 30, 2010

Proceed with Caution

We had a great day of training here in Boulder yesterday. (Or near Boulder anyway; 'twas our last high-mileage day.) It's now officially "taper time" for those who are competing in the Hawaii Ironman. And so I took a few minutes to brief those I guide...

"I hate to use negative reinforcement but now is not the time to do anything stupid. Please don't do anything new or crazy, as new or crazy is stupid at this point. Remember: stupid is as stupid does. Take care of yourself and avoid stupidity and stress; don't try to cope...just avoid it. Watch your step."

This last one seemed pretty obvious---"watch your step". And when I tell someone to watch their step, I'm not threatening them like some guy out for revenge might do. I'm essentially saying when it's time to watch your step, it is time to tip-toe (i.e., proceed with caution).

So imagine, if you will, my concern when I was out riding beside GoSonja during her transition run yesterday afternoon when she decided to go airborne thanks, in part, to a whopping one-centimeter protuberance in her path. ("In part" because the real cause for the fall was her inattentiveness.) Luckily, she broke her fall with her chin, nose, teeth and forehead, sparing precious body parts like her knees, elbows and wrists---those needed for an Ironman. And thankfully, my concern was all for naught when she bounced back up laughing.

Nonetheless, today I shout out another reminder: It's nine more days 'til the Biggest Dance of the year, folks. Please, no tripping until then! That day is enough of a trip as it is.

Monday, September 27, 2010

VolunteerMan

A couple of months ago I was chillfully but cheerfully situated atop a 14,240-foot mountain, minding my own business. Though I possess no business, it's crucial that one occasionally minds it. Anyway, while laboring to suck in enough oxygen and make sense of the fact I just pedaled up said mountain, I was presented with a gift. It was a plane ticket to Kona. A few of the athletes I guide chipped in to buy it for me, so I can watch them compete in the Ironman World Championships, now less than two weeks away. Not a day goes by where I don't ask myself, "What did I do to deserve this?" But this isn't why I write. And anyway, it's up to each of them to decide what I did to justify such a nice gesture. (I impose hard work upon them; they bestow gifts upon me...weird.)

Ever since that wonderful day I've slowly prepared myself for my trip. I've pulled the surfboard out of storage and picked up some sunscreen, a snorkel, a pair of fins (courtesy of the local pool) and a big enough beach towel (also from the pool's Lost & Found). The suitcase is packed and my plans are set.

So when another athlete I coach (who's also heading to Hawaii to observe the race) asked if I planned to volunteer during race week, I first thought, "And ruin my vacation? No thanks!" only to reconsider and ask myself, "Why not? That could be fun!"

But then I started to reconsider my initial reconsideration…there's NO WAY I'm going to volunteer.

You see, the Ironman name is a trademarked brand, owned by a for-profit conglomerate known as the World Triathlon Corporation (WTC). You've probably heard of them. They're good at what they do and, as such, have stuck around a while, circa 1990. In the business world this isn't always such a straightforward task. Nowadays the WTC runs close to a hundred triathlons around the planet and more with each passing year, as they continually buy out existing events to add to their collection. With this comes a monopoly of sorts and with that, less respect for their customers and an increase in entry fees.

But here's the interesting thing, and my justification for not volunteering (though the truth is, I need not justify my inactions). Unlike most businesses that actually compensate their workforce, the WTC enlists complimentary labor---labor provided by volunteers who are each required to sign a waiver (suckers, I call 'em). Most these poor suckers have no idea they're providing free labor for a for-profit company, believing instead that they're helping support the sporting community, or perhaps a charity associated with the WTC-owned race. But, despite the millions of dollars that WTC makes each year, the organization raises few for charity (they leave this to the non-profits crazy enough to associate with their brand), as its investors care only for their own charitable trust. And who can blame them? After all, it's 'for-profit', not 'for free'.

Now I'm all for free enterprise and profiting, but I hate to think that the exertion I bequeath is not only done for free, but to the benefit of a corporation, especially one that persists in having me sign a waiver each time I care to help their bottom line, a corporation that continues to raise already-steep entry fees, a corporation intent on squashing the little guy, a corporation that gives out little more than advertisements and race flyers to other events owned by the corporation. No thank you. WTC: WTF?

PS: Now, with all this said, if on race morning body-markers are needed for the women's 20-24, 25-29, 30-34 and 35-39 age groups, well, mark me down as your guy. In fact, pardon me for a minute here while I go add a few magic-markers to my suitcase.

PSPS: Falconhead Capital is another corporation unworthy of your free time and labor. They too own an increasing number of events (including the Muddy Buddy series and the Rock-n-Roll marathon moniker), in addition to owning Competitor, Inc., holders of Triathlete Magazine, Inside Triathlon Magazine, VeloNews Magazine, Competitor Magazine and other periodicals. It'll be interesting to see where this 'corporate takeover' mentality ultimately leads. Will more people be turned on to our sport? Or will they be turned away?

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Open-Water Mixed Martial Arts

Of all the things I've learned about swimming over the years—approximately two, though possibly as many as three---one of them stands above the rest: you can't really compare pool swimming with its open-water cousin. To me, that would be a lot like comparing road cycling and mountain biking, or bicycling and unicycling, or wine and beer, or apples and oranges. While there are similarities with all these things, so too are there major differences. Especially with mountain biking and apples. (One provides calories, the other scrapes and bruises.)

In all seriousness, or some seriousness anyway, one of the biggest lessons I had been taught when I first hopped in the pool was that form was EVERYTHING. Form, as in technique or skill. Without grasping the concept of proper technique, it's difficult to become a proficient pool swimmer. ("Proper", by the way, is only ever individually proper…think optimal.) Keep in mind though that at the top level of competitive swimming (i.e., the Olympics), there are far more similarities in stroke mechanics than there are differences.

Open-water swimming, however, is as much about drafting and stroke rate and muscle as it is about technique---if not more so. You can forget all that nonsense about "distance-per-stroke" and "rotation" and "hand entry" and whatnot.

This is especially the case with long-course triathlon, where the swim is really only ever about setting ourselves up for the remainder of the day...oh, and dealing with the masses trying to drown us. And of course in addition to other swimmers/flailers, we're also forced to negotiate cold temperatures (though the pools in Europe tend to be colder than most oceans and lakes), currents, waves, tsunamis, sharks, electric eels, Orcas, man-eating turtles, microbial secret agents, floating debris, a lack of lane lines (humans NEED lines!), fishing line (humans NEED lines!), kelp, undertows, salt, runaway buoys, turns, boats, toxins, jellyfish, a lack of lifeguards, wind, sailors (and their incessant cussing), the Navy, submarines, whirlpools, the enormous intense orb to the east, mermaids, icebergs, wetsuits, oil spills, sand, sea horses, volunteers, and a whole host of other predicaments and impediments, all of which would easily be overcome with enough firepower, if only fire worked in water.

Open-water swimming, you see, ain't quite the safety net that is pool swimming. Indeed, it is more like mixed martial arts than it is swimming, though thankfully there are no cages. (One might argue that a cage would be nice to have when sharks are present.) And to think there are still some folks who believe that triathlon is a non-contact sport!

In this vein, let me share with you, if I may, a short aqua-account from the days of yore, back when MTV actually played music videos…

Years ago I was safely situated in the lead swim group during the Hawaiian Ironman. I had found myself there because of a deep but wholesome fear of the ocean; the sooner I could escape its immensity and its ferocity, the better off I'd be. Fear works wonders like this. Anyway, there were about fifteen of us there, with a couple of speedier swimmers a minute or two off the front. I'd have joined the amphibious pair---Nate Llerandi and Wolfgang Dietrich---had I been able to, but reasoned that sharks were more likely to strike had I been the one leading the charges. (One never knows.)

So I stuck within the safety net of the school. And life was good until I found myself sandwiched between a guy named Dave Scott and another by the name of Tony DeBoom. Both, you see, are "strength swimmers", muscling their way through the water and anything that happens to be floating in it. Well, I tried gently to persuade the two, through various gestures and tactical maneuvers, to depart my side. The splashes they'd been creating, along with the knocks to the head and ribcage, were just too much. At one point the two even criss-crossed over the top of me! Here we had an entire ocean and here we had a problem with crowding. Lots of bubbles…lots of trouble, as the B-52's might sing.

Finally, I decided that I too could play their game, throwing a hard elbow at one of them. It was Tony I could tell, as Dave possessed a much uglier turn-over and continued his splashy tsunami-stroke. I eventually decided to defer, settling in on Dave's feet. I wouldn't see Tony again, at least not until mile 80 or so on the bike, when he rode up beside me. He had a steady stream of blood flowing down his face. I played dumb (a feat that normally doesn't require much acting on my part).

"What the hell happened?!"

"Some asshole broke my nose during the swim!"

Indeed it did appear abnormally large and off-kilter, but then I'm not one to speak. At least my schnozz hadn't created a potentially lethal curiosity among the local shark population. Nor was it staining my singlet.

Since it's well-known that misery loves company, I considered consoling Tony and mentioning my aching elbow, but then thought better of it. He had, after all, been an Army Ranger at one point, the sort of guy who could kill a man just by staring him down long enough. Not even Chuck Norris is as tough. I pedaled hard and left him behind once more, throbbing elbow and all.

Which brings me back to my point of open-water swimming. (Actually, it doesn't, but I had to get here somehow.) My point is that there's virtually no need to look smooth or worry about your stroke or your efficiency in the ocean or in a lake; the fish certainly don't care, and the spectators waiting on terra firma can't even see you. Efficiency is measured only by the race-clock and your proximity to other competitors.

The key is to get through all the aforementioned obstructions as quickly as possible, conserving enough energy to ride and run to the best of your abilities. This way you can reach the med tent that much sooner, where you'll be able to tend to your bruised elbow before the guy with the broken nose shows.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Run Gait Analysis

Here we have a picture of two top elite female triathletes, during a recent run gait analysis at Tri-Massage.com. You may have to click on it for a larger view. One of the athletes happens to be one of the faster runners in the sport (if not the fastest), while the other happens to be of the fastest cyclists in the sport (if not the fastest). You can probably guess which is which, though neither is a witch. (Actually, neither just "happens to be" as fast as they are; they work hard for it.)

I'll let you, the viewer, decide who looks like the more accomplished runner (and indeed is), and who looks like a cyclist running. And yes, I realize they're not in the same phase of their strides. Nor is this a very good photo, but I don't care.

Good luck!