Wednesday, October 3, 2007

The Coaching Overkill

Do you need a triathlon coach?

It seems today that there are more triathlon coaches out there than there are triathletes. Here in Boulder I personally know of about thirty-five triathlon coaches. And there's roughly the same number of cycling coaches. There are plenty more I don't know about, I'm sure. An extensive search on the Internet shows there are literally hundreds more across the US and Canada, all of whom deem themselves "experts". Now, I'll admit I don't have a problem with this; if someone believes they need a coach, they should probably have one. Where I do have a problem, however, is the manner in which many of these coaches---excuse me, I mean experts---go about advertising their wares.

By definition, a coach is someone who can help you achieve your best, or should be someone who can help you achieve your best, anyway. It's plain and simple really, and all other meanings are moot. But by perusing some of these coaches' "philosophies" and/or practices on their websites, you'd think you couldn't live another minute without one. "You need a triathlon coach!" they insist. (Incidentally, the phrase "coaching philosophy" is absolutely idiotic. The "philosophy" of all half-decent coaches should be the same: to get his or her athletes as prepared as possible to achieve their best performance when it matters most, on race day. If a coach starts talking about his or her "philosophy," as though theirs is all that matters, well, that's a sure sign you should hightail it. Ask about his or her practices or methodologies.)

To me the word "need" is a potent one.

Of course you don't need a coach. Nobody does, not even the fastest or highest-paid triathletes in the world. What you do need is enough air to breathe, enough water to drink, enough food to eat (Lord knows the Americans have a tough time determining just how much this is), and an environment conducive toward survival. That's all you need. Hell, my very childhood proved that you don't even need love to survive, and I made it through that fine*. (*The word "fine" is used in a highly subjective manner here; hold on while I go spin my neighbor's cat by the tail.) So, for shits and giggles, I suggest responding to these coaches in the same manner: that you don't need their services, but that you might be interested in them, if they're interested in helping you (and not just for the ₵oinage you provide). Maybe then they'll rewrite their idiotic websites.

Now I suppose asking if you "need" a coach is fair enough. No harm done, right? But some of these, ahem, experts assure you that indeed, you do need their services---that you can simply forget about your dreams and desires without their expertise and assistance. One or two even go so far as to compare your triathlon preparation to scaling Mount Everest, liking themselves to a mountaineering guide, a leader who may very well save your life. Give me a frickin' break! If triathlon were truly a life or death situation like climbing Everest can often be, you would see everyone testing positive come race day. After all, it would only help ensure your survival.

Another issue I'd like to raise is the entire "coaching business" thing. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems to me that so many coaches are more business-like than coach-like. They offer different "levels" of service and charge astronomical amounts for each subsequent level or "package". With slick marketing campaigns, ghost-writer written articles/books, and gonzo-styled advertising, a few coaches have come to build some pretty immense coaching empires. They continue to add more coaches underneath them while they travel to and from all the big events and tend to their finances and tax returns and margaritas. They've assembled a "coaching network" around them and claim, in so many words, that if you're not a part of said group your performance may very well suffer. Not only do they send this falsified message to athletes, but to other coaches not yet a part of their program.

This, of course, is absolutely bogus and I, for one, do not feel threatened. Not only are you paying for such slick marketing when you agree to the terms of their required "coaching contract," but you're now part of a well-oiled marketing machine that doesn't always think for itself, but rather only of itself. George Carlin once wrote that he loves and cherishes individuals as he meets them, but loathes the groups and committees they belong to. I see eye to eye with him. Freethinkers are really the only thinkers.

And, speaking of eye to eye, what's with this whole "Internet coaching" thing? I find it mildly astonishing that there are actually athletes who have never met their coach eye to eye, or face to face. This is completely bewildering to me. Maybe I'm mistaken, but is this really the definition of a solid coaching relationship? If you are not there in person, you are not coaching. You can't coach what you don't observe. Sending or downloading workouts is not coaching. Talking about training on your smart-phone is NOT coaching. Perhaps I'm old fashioned but I still get a kick out of riding with the athletes I help guide (this is why I call myself a co-coach and not merely a coach). Same goes for swimming and to a lesser extent, running. (I prefer to run alone but thanks to the advent of the mountain bike, I can ride beside them as they run, the poor bastards!) I believe they benefit from this hand's-on approach too. Their results have shown it anyway, and in the end isn't that why someone pays a coach?

And of pay, I find that this is perhaps the most shocking part of the entire coaching "industry." But then I suppose if an athlete is going to purchase a 15-pound bike for close to five or six grand and love it so much that he or she is going to take an extra hour or two just to ride come race day, then why not spend upwards of $1,500 a month to have someone coach you? Especially someone famous. Heck, Hollywood has pretty much proven that famous people know more.

And because someone has won Such & Such race and "walked the walk," does it make him or her a better coach? Methinks not. And because someone has two or three letters next to his name, letters that cost tens of thousands of dollars and four to ten years at university---when instead they could have been outside training (themselves or others)---does it make him more qualified? And what about being "certified"? I was always told I was certifiable or maybe it was certifiably something or rather, but I don't care to actually go through with the whole deal. Level one, level two, I'm not so sure it makes a better coach of you. You don't learn to coach in a classroom or during a weekend certification course, you learn to coach by coaching.

So what is it that makes a good coach? And why do so many triathletes feel they need one nowadays? Just a couple of decades ago there might have been but a handful of triathlon coaches across the entire United States while today even Donald Trump is rumored to be thinking of dropping everything else to become one. Is it that lucrative? I wish I knew the answers, but I'm inclined to think that the relationship part is as important as anything. As they say in business, "It's not what you know; it's who you know." So, maybe as a coach, it could be worth getting to know your athlete. It might be worth watching them do a flip-turn, or watching his or her run gait. It could be worth riding with them for five or six hours, as he or she begins to cramp and turn moody. It might just be good business sense. And who knows? You might even make a friend for life...assuming their moodiness doesn't drive you berserk (or yours, them).

All I know is that sport is supposed to be fun and challenging. The minute this is lost, so too are you. If to you competing becomes a job, and you begin to hate working, you better take a long look at the other jobs or out there. I've done one or two of them and am here to tell you that most of them suck, as do the bosses running them. You don't need a coach, especially when it comes to having fun and challenging yourself. But if a coach can help you achieve your best and you continue to have fun and challenge yourself then by all means hire one. Just don't get lost in the process. I still think you're your own best coach. And I don't even know you.

Coaches: athletes don't care how much you know; they want to know how much you care.

"Now it is true that I could have learned without a teacher but it would have been risky for me." ---Mark Twain, Taming the Bicycle

17 comments:

Huw said...

Good post, Chuckie. I am a triathlon coach and I agree with your comments wholeheartedly. People have got to enjoy their sport and appreciate being fit and alive - and be grateful for it!

Huw said...

PS I've only recently found your blog - which I like a lot, otherwise I wouldn't bother commenting - and I'm finding white text on black a bit painful to read. Any chance of going black on white?
Huw, loosely involved with www.runflux.com

Bob Mitera said...

Great entry. I help challenge the athletes I help to prepare for events by getting them to train more or differently than they would have normally. Most have been online - but here is my difference - with the internet, text messages, and downloadable power, heart rate info - I know where they are and change workouts daily from the original text based on what is happening TODAY. I charge my cost in insurance - that's it. (also why I'm not making any money and don't see my wife much...) Leave the format - disagree with huw on that.

Bob Mitera said...

Additionally...I am not "certified" but that didn't seem to matter to all the IM finishers, etc. I've helped. I only care that they get fit and have a great race experience.

Pieta said...

I am a non-American having competed at different races overseas (including Ironmans) and it always amazes me that people who are really nothing special all have coaches. And not just one but multiple coaches. I train with no coach and love it. A coach needs to be hands on and know you. Not just some virtual person that actually don't care.

Dan Seifring said...

Hey Chuckie,

I know I am commenting to a post that is over 2 months old but I have been thinking of this post for sometime.

I agree with your points about coaching overkill but my question to you is...

What is a guy like me to do?

I am new to the sport (only have 1 sprint under my belt). Heck pretty new to any activity really. I know I will never be a great athlete but I want to reach my full potential which is honestly a middle of the packer at best.

I have no clue what VO2 or LT means (I have heard the terms). Is there a good book you would recommend? I am doing this sport because I know if I am not active I will easily be back to 330 pounds if not more.

Thank you in advance.

Dan

Chuckie V said...

Hi Dan,

There are a few good books out there. One of the better ones I've perused through is called 'Triathlon 101' by a fellow named Mora, I believe. Friel's 'Training Bible' is perhaps filled with too much information and is geared toward overly-competitive types, not just beginners.

Another avenue is www.beginnertriathlete.com, if you haven't already been there. I'm told that there are plenty of helpful folks on the site, though I haven't been in a long while.

As for LT and V02, they're just terms for "lactate threshold" (LT) and quite simply "oxygen uptake" (V02), and knowing what they are and what they mean can certainly benefit the endurance athlete. But I think, in your case (and I follow your blog) the most important number you should concern yourself with is your weight. You've brought it down tremendously and perhaps there's still more to go. If so, focus on that over the winter and then in the spring, consider visiting a reputable lab for a lactate threshold test (cycling or running) and possibly a V02 Max test. A good physiologist or coach will explain what these numbers mean to you and how you can go about improving them. He or she should also present you with an idea of how to structure your training, based on specific heart-rate "zones" that give each workout its purpose.

The term "zone" is a peculiar one in that your heart doesn't know what a "zone" is or that it may be in a different "zone". It simply knows varying degrees of difficulty, in response to any number of factors: exercise intensity, climatic conditions, dehydration, etc. But again, such "zones" give you an idea of a workout's purpose, whether it's time to push or time to relax.

I wrote this particular blog simply because I believe there are too many incompetent multi-sport coaches out there, so finding one that works for you, with you, can be tricky. But they're out there.

I also essentially wrote, or at least implied, that an athlete shouldn't feel the NEED to have a coach, but rather a desire to and only if they're sure it will facilitate the ascension to their ultimate potential. "Ultimate potential" means different things to different people, just as it means different things for any individual on any given day. It's a highly ambiguous phrase, but the process in reaching toward it is every bit as beautiful as reaching it. And anyway, I'm inclined to think that you tend to know when you're close to it.

Dan, I may end up posting this as a blog, if you don't mind. It's gotten my brain firing on all cylinders!

Let me know if there's anything else I might be able to help you with and try to keep the holiday intake to a minimum!

Oh, and finally, consider looking into some sort of aerobic test that you can do on your own. Do a search for "aerobic test protocol" or "MAF test protocol" or something similar. If you can't find anything that suits you I might be able to give you an idea of how to go about one. All that is required is some motivation, some patience, a heart-rate monitor and a place to do it.

-Chuckie

Krista said...

Hey there Chuckie- I knew you way back when- figure skating- not you of course the rest of us. My son Gunnar has just begun to work with the OTC and Triathlon. I was hoping that you may have some suggestions.
Thanks,

Krista

Chuckie V said...

Hi Krista!
Have Gunnar drop me an e-mail at: rubberchuckie at yahoo dot com

I would love to help!

Watch out...if he's not already addicted to the sport, he will be!

By the sounds of it, life has treated you well since those Olympic Training Center days!

-Chuckie

Christy said...

Thank YOU! I know you won't see this, years later. I am new to tri and was so excited. Got my body in good shape before tri. A friend talked me into one of "those" marketing programs. I was clear about wanting help w/ open water. I was asked by those groups: Why I researched on my own. I gained fat wt in tri w/ the foods & following their plan. Now, I am on my own again, losing wt and going back to research. I'll hit tri when I lose the damn weight. What is wrong with researching even when you have a coach? I finally got to race for the first time in my life. I wanted to learn everything I could. My husband is losing wt running at night, doing push-ups and wts. Plus, reading blogs like yours for inspiration.

Paul said...

Fleck recently posted a question on Twitter about being coached. I was the only respponse that was not. Pretty much for the same reasons you mention. I just could not state all of that in 140 characters. Coaching does not suck it just has a tendency to suck the fun out of amateur sport.

Miguel Andrade said...

Dear Coach,

I have found this post today and I think I have exactly the same opinion.

I mainly need a coach to guide me troughout the year (what types of time, intensity...). I've bought many books but I think having someone experienced behind me that gives me plans and says when to backup or when to go hard is much better.

What is your opinion?

Thank you.

Miguel

Chuckie V said...

Miguel,
A coach can be a valuable asset, depending on an athlete's goals and personality and needs. But you'll want to find one who can work BESIDE you, not just from a safe distance over the Internet! But I do recommend reading as much as you can get your hands on, along with pestering other, more knowledgeable athletes.

Of course, you'll also want to pay close attention to your own responses to training and learn from yourself. If you have any specific questions, I might be able to help.

-Chuckie

Feed Your Performance said...

Dear Coach,

Thank you for your help.

I might ask you some things if needed.

Best,

Miguel

Chuckie V said...

Feel free to Miguel,
I've been in your position myself, many, many years ago. But don't go searching for elusive "secrets" or taking advise from everyone; you'll get lots of conflicting information and it may overwhelm you. Just stick to that which you know works (training!) and repeat it ad nauseum. The fundamentals are NOT confusing and many coaches want to pretend that they possess the "key" to your best performances. This is not true; only YOU do. Ask those you respect and study those beating you, those you may or may not look up to. Most of all, keep training.

-Chuckie

Eric said...

Hey Chuckie,

I really like your thoughts on the whole coach-athlete relationship. I recently made the jump from age-grouper to elite triathlete and the whole process of feeling out a coach has been very awkward and off-putting for me for a lot of the reasons you talk about. Glad to hear a honest voice of reason out there amongst the bs, posturing, shameless self-promotion and neediness. Keep up the good work!

E

Chuckie V said...

Thanks Eric,
I'll say this: if a coach is that in need of stroking his own ego, the relationship likely won't work. And if he is in it for business, it won't work (at least not for the athlete).

Thankfully, these kinds of coaches are pretty easy to identify, whether on forums or in person! Steer clear of them and work on being your own best coach. In the end, you really are anyway. You've just got to do your homework and be objective (and honest) about your approach.

-CV